---
title: "2010Jun13"
id: "4522"
type: "page"
slug: "2010jun13"
published_at: "2026-05-13T02:04:52+00:00"
modified_at: "2026-05-13T17:08:05+00:00"
url: "https://ubuntustudio.org/ubuntustudio/meetings/2010jun13/"
markdown_url: "https://ubuntustudio.org/ubuntustudio/meetings/2010jun13.md"
excerpt: "UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jun13 – Ubuntu Wiki Source: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jun13 2010Jun13 Ubuntu Studio Meetings Schedule Old Meeting Logs Ubuntu Studio Meetings Schedule Old Meeting Logs Contents Agenda Minutes Action Items Contents Agenda Minutes Action Items Agenda Begin Meeting Call to order in #ubuntustudio-devel at..."
---

# UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jun13 – Ubuntu Wiki

Source: [https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jun13](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jun13)

## [2010Jun13](2010Jun13)

| Ubuntu Studio Meetings Schedule | Old Meeting Logs |
| --- | --- |

[Ubuntu Studio Meetings Schedule](index)

[Old Meeting Logs](Minutes)

| Contents Agenda Minutes Action Items |
| --- |

Contents

1. [Agenda](2010Jun13#Agenda)
2. [Minutes](2010Jun13#Minutes)
3. [Action Items](2010Jun13#Action_Items)

### Agenda

- Begin Meeting Call to order in #ubuntustudio-devel at [7pm (19:00) UTC June 13 2010](http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=6&day=13&year=2010&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=0) Note attendees
- Agenda amendments
- LV2 Packaging: continue LV2 packaging plan – [UbuntuStudio/TaskLV2Inclusion](../../TaskLV2Inclusion) might focus on getting these into Debian first quadrispro has already commented he wanted to do the vocoder, perhaps he can help with others any others with packaging experience and want to help? can Debian Multimedia Team also help?
- JACK2 / Pulse Audio Integration: this is looking good already because JACK2 is in Debian already (per [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso) on IRC) [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso) is apparently tracking this crimsun, [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso) , and persia have talked on IRC about how to proceed and might discuss this at UDS with Free
- Network Manager user’s troubles was a bug in gnome-network-admin that left options not shown or changeable Ricardo (rlameiro) reported it: [https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/570828](https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/570828) how soon can a fix be expected for users? Is it possible to do a ISO re-spin, if the bug is corrected? however, we still might consider testing [NetworkManager](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetworkManager) again whatever the decision going forward, we should document it and post to the -user mailing list
- Ubuntu Studio Controls Update and Redesign update ubuntustudio-controls for rtpri and memlock settings JACK now handles rtpri and memlock in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf see [http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428](http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428) for background Ricardo (rlameiro) is proposing a redesign of ubuntustudio-controls see [UbuntuStudio/ControlsRedesign](../../ControlsRedesign) rtirq script for avoid irq conflicts (especially for firewire) enable Ubuntu Studio PPA for -rt kernels and “backported” applications install -lowlatency/-preempt/-rt kernel from PPA install ubuntu-restricted-extras user in audio group (perhaps check box to add and remove) remove nice setting? see: [http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html](http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html) is there anything else someone probably does routinely to a Ubuntu Studio install that we could incorporate?
- Ubuntu Studio Applications Backporting discussion between John Dong and myself after Jussi poked me: [https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-May/002364.html](https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-May/002364.html) John suggested using “official” Ubuntu Studio backporting PPA because: it’s like kubuntu it allows us to maintain control it doesn’t overload the already overworked backports team provides proving grounds that backported apps have quality then can be included in official Ubuntu backports repository if we don’t want to use Ubuntu Studio backports PPA then we need small group to test and provide vocal feedback in backport bugs
- Update Website good summary of previous discussion at [UbuntuStudio/Sandbox#Notes%20from%20IRC%20Logs](../../Sandbox#Notes%20from%20IRC%20Logs) a good direction appears to be using Word Press detrate is really engaged with this task, we should focus on supporting him you can find the available information at [UbuntuStudio/TaskWebRevamp](../../TaskWebRevamp)
- Reduce Delta Between Ubuntu Studio and Debian information about this can be found at: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html) push patches back to Debian Multimedia where applicable for the local changes this would reduce work for Ubuntu Studio team because hopefully the packages will autosync in future releases see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB) see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB) this will also hopefully increase and improve our relationship with the Debian Multimedia Team (note: quadrispro is a member)
- Testing Procedures in order to help (and encourage) our users to test we should develop testing procedures since stochastic is lead of [ubuntustudio-testers group](https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-testers) can he help develop procedures ScottL offers to assist develop the procedures and document it on help.ubuntu.com
- Ubuntu Studio Documentation establish uses for help.ubuntu.com vs. wiki.ubuntu.com suggested direction: help.ubuntu.com is community facing documentation wiki.ubuntu.com is for developers and contributors to organize for release document this decision and email users
- Call to order in #ubuntustudio-devel at [7pm (19:00) UTC June 13 2010](http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=6&day=13&year=2010&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=0)
- Note attendees

Call to order in #ubuntustudio-devel at [7pm (19:00) UTC June 13 2010](http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=6&day=13&year=2010&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=0)

- continue LV2 packaging plan – [UbuntuStudio/TaskLV2Inclusion](../../TaskLV2Inclusion)
- might focus on getting these into Debian first
- quadrispro has already commented he wanted to do the vocoder, perhaps he can help with others
- any others with packaging experience and want to help?
- can Debian Multimedia Team also help?

continue LV2 packaging plan – [UbuntuStudio/TaskLV2Inclusion](../../TaskLV2Inclusion)

- this is looking good already because JACK2 is in Debian already (per [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso) on IRC)
- [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso) is apparently tracking this
- crimsun, [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso) , and persia have talked on IRC about how to proceed and might discuss this at UDS with Free

this is looking good already because JACK2 is in Debian already (per [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso)
 on IRC)

[TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso)
 is apparently tracking this

crimsun, [TheMuso](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TheMuso)
, and persia have talked on IRC about how to proceed and might discuss this at UDS with Free

- user’s troubles was a bug in gnome-network-admin that left options not shown or changeable
- Ricardo (rlameiro) reported it: [https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/570828](https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/570828)
- how soon can a fix be expected for users?
- Is it possible to do a ISO re-spin, if the bug is corrected? however, we still might consider testing [NetworkManager](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetworkManager) again whatever the decision going forward, we should document it and post to the -user mailing list

Ricardo (rlameiro) reported it: [https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/570828](https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/570828)

- however, we still might consider testing [NetworkManager](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetworkManager) again
- whatever the decision going forward, we should document it and post to the -user mailing list

however, we still might consider testing [NetworkManager](https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NetworkManager)
 again

- update ubuntustudio-controls for rtpri and memlock settings JACK now handles rtpri and memlock in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf see [http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428](http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428) for background
- Ricardo (rlameiro) is proposing a redesign of ubuntustudio-controls see [UbuntuStudio/ControlsRedesign](../../ControlsRedesign) rtirq script for avoid irq conflicts (especially for firewire) enable Ubuntu Studio PPA for -rt kernels and “backported” applications install -lowlatency/-preempt/-rt kernel from PPA install ubuntu-restricted-extras user in audio group (perhaps check box to add and remove) remove nice setting? see: [http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html](http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html) is there anything else someone probably does routinely to a Ubuntu Studio install that we could incorporate?
- JACK now handles rtpri and memlock in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf
- see [http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428](http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428) for background

see [http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428](http://linuxaudio.org/mailarchive/lau/2010/3/5/166428)
 for background

- see [UbuntuStudio/ControlsRedesign](../../ControlsRedesign)
- rtirq script for avoid irq conflicts (especially for firewire)
- enable Ubuntu Studio PPA for -rt kernels and “backported” applications
- install -lowlatency/-preempt/-rt kernel from PPA
- install ubuntu-restricted-extras
- user in audio group (perhaps check box to add and remove)
- remove nice setting? see: [http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html](http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html)
- is there anything else someone probably does routinely to a Ubuntu Studio install that we could incorporate?

see [UbuntuStudio/ControlsRedesign](../../ControlsRedesign)

remove nice setting? see: [http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html](http://www.pubbs.net/201003/linuxaudio/10007-re-lau-changing-for-editing-etcsecuritylimitsconf-in-debiantesting-ubuntu-lucid.html)

- discussion between John Dong and myself after Jussi poked me: [https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-May/002364.html](https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-May/002364.html)
- John suggested using “official” Ubuntu Studio backporting PPA because: it’s like kubuntu it allows us to maintain control it doesn’t overload the already overworked backports team provides proving grounds that backported apps have quality then can be included in official Ubuntu backports repository
- if we don’t want to use Ubuntu Studio backports PPA then we need small group to test and provide vocal feedback in backport bugs

discussion between John Dong and myself after Jussi poked me: [https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-May/002364.html](https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2010-May/002364.html)

- it’s like kubuntu
- it allows us to maintain control
- it doesn’t overload the already overworked backports team
- provides proving grounds that backported apps have quality
- then can be included in official Ubuntu backports repository
- good summary of previous discussion at [UbuntuStudio/Sandbox#Notes%20from%20IRC%20Logs](../../Sandbox#Notes%20from%20IRC%20Logs)
- a good direction appears to be using Word Press
- detrate is really engaged with this task, we should focus on supporting him
- you can find the available information at [UbuntuStudio/TaskWebRevamp](../../TaskWebRevamp)

good summary of previous discussion at [UbuntuStudio/Sandbox#Notes%20from%20IRC%20Logs](../../Sandbox#Notes%20from%20IRC%20Logs)

you can find the available information at [UbuntuStudio/TaskWebRevamp](../../TaskWebRevamp)

- information about this can be found at: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html)
- push patches back to Debian Multimedia where applicable for the local changes this would reduce work for Ubuntu Studio team because hopefully the packages will autosync in future releases see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB) see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB)
- this will also hopefully increase and improve our relationship with the Debian Multimedia Team (note: quadrispro is a member)

information about this can be found at: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html)

- this would reduce work for Ubuntu Studio team because hopefully the packages will autosync in future releases
- see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB)
- see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB)

see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#sameversionbutlocalinB)

see: [http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB](http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/multidistrotools/ubuntustudio.html#outdatedandlocalinB)

- in order to help (and encourage) our users to test we should develop testing procedures
- since stochastic is lead of [ubuntustudio-testers group](https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-testers) can he help develop procedures
- ScottL offers to assist develop the procedures and document it on help.ubuntu.com

since stochastic is lead of [ubuntustudio-testers group](https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-testers)
 can he help develop procedures

- establish uses for help.ubuntu.com vs. wiki.ubuntu.com
- suggested direction: help.ubuntu.com is community facing documentation wiki.ubuntu.com is for developers and contributors to organize for release
- document this decision and email users
- help.ubuntu.com is community facing documentation
- wiki.ubuntu.com is for developers and contributors to organize for release

### Minutes

- blah

### Action Items

- blah

UbuntuStudio/Meetings/2010Jun13 (last edited 2011-04-03 13:21:27 by conr-adsl-dhcp-64-92-4-194)